Skip to main content

SLA And AAS: Let us handle our own legal affairs

Let us handle our own affairs, say Sabah and Sarawak legal fraternities

KOTA KINABALU: The legal fraternities in Sabah and Sarawak are against the extension of the Legal Profession Act (LPA) 2019 to both states.

The Sabah Law Society (SLS) and the Advocates Association of Sarawak (AAS) said they are able to handle their own legal matters.

They said they oppose the provisions concerning both the extension of the LPA 2019 and the repeal of the Advocates Ordinances in Sabah and Sarawak — known as the extension and repeal provisions — as contained in the draft Legal Profession Bill 2019.

“While we recognise that the existing LPA 1976 contains identical extension and repeal provisions, both the SLS and AAS are of the view that such extension and repeal provisions should not be included in this current LPA Bill or any future or similar legislation,” they said in a joint statement.

“The SLS and AAS were not consulted on the LPA Bill.

“Our position is to collectively and unreservedly oppose the extension and repeal provisions and to demand that they be deleted from the LPA Bill.”

The joint statement was issued by SLS president Brenndon Keith Soh and AAS president Ranbir Singh Sangha.

It said the Advocates Ordinance of Sabah was recently amended by Parliament to create the statutory body known as SLS.

AAS is creating a similar statutory body for the legal profession in Sarawak, it said, and thus, there is no necessity for the LPA 2019 to be extended to either of the two states.

The statement said “this united message” will be conveyed to the attorneys-general of Sabah and Sarawak, who will be at liberty to convey the same to the AG’s Chambers in Putrajaya.

“We will similarly be writing to the Bar Council of the Malaysian Bar to record our discontent with the LPA Bill,” it said.

Outlining the legal structure in Malaysia, the statement said the profession is governed by three separate sets of legislation — the LPA 1976 for Peninsular Malaysia and the respective Advocates Ordinance 1953 of Sabah and Sarawak.

Prior to the LPA 1976, Peninsular Malaysia was regulated by the Advocates and Solicitors Ordinance 1947 and one must fulfil certain criteria before being admitted to practise in Sabah and Sarawak.

“The Advocates Ordinances of Sabah and Sarawak contain a prerequisite to the admission of advocates to the High Court in the two states, whereby a residency qualification must be fulfilled.”

That person must be born in Sabah or Sarawak or has been resident in either state for a continuous period of five years or satisfies the chief judge that he or she is domiciled in either state at the time of applying for admission.

Upon the formation of Malaysia in 1963, the Advocates Ordinances of both Sabah and Sarawak were declared federal law and any amendment must be passed by Parliament.

“It must be emphasised that under the Federal Constitution, there are two High Courts in Malaysia,” the statement added.

“Sabah and Sarawak are under the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak, which has coordinate jurisdiction with the High Court of Malaya, which exercises jurisdiction in Peninsular Malaysia.

“The removal of the extension and repeal provisions would go a long way to recognising the historical autonomy that both Sabah and Sarawak have over the legal profession.”

Read More from this source

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tinggalkan DAP

Tinggalkan DAP Memang tak sangka, bila dengar berita ni. Ong Kian Ming ni dah 14 tahun dalam DAP, lama sangat tu, tiba-tiba keluar mesti ada sebab berat. Dari apa yang dia cakap, isu utama dia tak puas hati keputusan parti kekal dalam kabinet. Dia rasa DAP patut keluar dulu, tekan kerajaan buat perubahan yang dijanjikan, tapi parti pilih untuk terus kekal. Bila prinsip sendiri tak sama dengan hala tuju parti, memang susah nak terus tinggal. Dia pun kata tak masuk parti lain, tak nak bertanding juga. Nampak macam bukan sebab nak lari ke tempat lain, tapi betul-betul rasa tak sehaluan dah. Bila orang yang dah lama dalam parti pun buat keputusan macam ni, mesti ada benda yang tak kena di dalam. Entah-entah ini cuma permulaan saja, belum tahu siapa lagi akan ikut jejak langkah dia selepas ni.
Post a Comment
Read more

Pilih semula BN kalau kami gagal kata Saddiq

KUALA LUMPUR: Ketua Pemuda Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM), Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman menegaskan Pakatan Harapan (PH) sanggup dibuang seandainya PH gagal memenuhi manifesto mereka selepas dipilih sebagai kerajaan dalam Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU14). “Kalau Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, Rafizi Ramli, Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali termasuk saya gagal menunaikan janji, buanglah kami dan pilihlah BN,” kata Syed Saddiq ketika sesi acara 'Sinar Debat bersama Exco Pemuda UMNO'. Syed Saddiq berkongsi pentas dengan Exco Pemuda UMNO, Rahman Hussin dalam forum anjuran Sinar Harian diadakan di ibu pejabatnya di Shah Alam, Selangor pada Isnin. Menurut Syed Saddiq, PH perlu diberi peluang demi masa depan yang baharu. Ujar beliau, rakyat berkuasa untuk membawa perubahan kerana walaupun negara ditadbir oleh BN lebih 60 tahun, parti itu adalah tidak sama seperti dahulu. Menurutnya, PH juga akan membebaskan media dan mana-mana kerajaan ti...
Post a Comment
Read more

RM314 Juta Tidak Diterima Kerajaan, Anthony Loke Patut Dipertanggungjawapkan

Isu penggantungan perkhidmatan MYEG dan Zetrix AI ini bukan sekadar pertikaian komersial biasa tetapi ia satu isu yang melibatkan amanah rakyat dan aliran dana negara. Dua platform ini  diwujudkan untuk memperkemas urusan awam dan mempercepatkan transformasi digital kerajaan justru kegagalan menyerahkan hasil berjumlah RM314 juta amatlah membimbangkan. Jumlah ini bukan kecil dan ia adalah hak rakyat yang sepatutnya digunakan untuk membiayai pelbagai keperluan pembangunan dan kebajikan masyarakat.  Apabila dua entiti ini gagal menunaikan tanggungjawab kewangan mereka rakyat mula mempersoalkan pengawasan dan mekanisme pemantauan yang ada di bawah kementerian berkenaan. Ia menimbulkan keraguan tentang sejauh mana kerajaan memastikan rakan kongsi yang dilantik mematuhi syarat perjanjian. Perkara yang lebih mendesak adalah ke mana perginya wang tersebut dan mengapa kelewatan ini dibiarkan berlaku sehingga ke tahap penggantungan perkhidmatan. Semua ini berlaku di bawah pengawasan m...
Post a Comment
Read more