Skip to main content

Court throws out Dr M’s appeal over forex losses suit

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today dismissed Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s appeal to reinstate his suit to invalidate a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) report into foreign exchange losses suffered by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) in the 1990s.
Justice Ahmadi Asnawi, who chaired a three-man panel, said the findings of the RCI are not subject to challenge.
He added that Mahathir was challenging the findings of the RCI itself, as contained in the report.
Hence, he said, the Federal Court decision on the RCI into the controversial video clip case of former lawyer VK Lingam applies to Mahathir’s case.
The Federal Court had ruled in 2011 that the findings of the RCI could not be reviewed as the commissioners had only made findings and not a decision.
Ahmadi, who sat with justices Lau Bee Lan and Has Zanah Mehat, said Section 22 of the Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950 provides wide discretion to RCIs to regulate their own affairs and procedures, including the compilation of reports and regulations for presentation to the Agong.
“We are also of the view that it is not the role of this court to tell the RCI how to run its affairs because Section 22 of the act is very wide to govern the conduct,” he said.
The panel affirmed the Dec 17, 2018 High Court decision to strike out Mahathir’s originating summons in which he sought a declaration that the RCI report on BNM’s forex trading losses is invalid, incomplete and defective as it excluded the legal documents of witnesses, notes of proceedings and written and oral submissions.
In his suit filed in December 2017, Mahathir also sought a declaration that any report by the RCI set up under the Commissions of Enquiry Act would only be legal if it had all the written statements of the witnesses who testified during proceedings as well as the notes of proceedings and submissions.
He named the RCI chairman, Mohd Sidek Hassan, its members Kamaludin Md Said, Tajuddin Atan, Saw Choo Boon, K Pushpanathanan and Yusof Ismail, as well as former prime minister Najib Razak, Cabinet members and the government as defendants in the suit.
Mahathir’s counsel, Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, earlier submitted that his client was not seeking to quash the findings of the RCI but wanted a declaration that the report would only be complete and valid if it contained the relevant documents.
However, senior federal counsel Mazlifah Ayob, appearing for the respondents, argued that if the RCI report was declared null and void, the RCI’s findings and recommendations would also be declared null and void.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Laporan lengkap Tragedi 13 Mei oleh MAGERAN

Laporan lengkap Tragedi 13 Mei oleh MAGERAN Portal Malaysiakini telah menerbitkan artikel mengenai peristiwa 13 Mei dari sumber, dan beberapa wawancara. Ada beberapa perkara penting yang tidak disebutkan dalam artikel tersebut, yang kami rasakan perlu dibaca oleh setiap warga. Untuk makluman pembaca, perkara penting tersebut diceritakan dengan terperinci dalam Laporan Tragedi 13 Mei yang disediakan oleh Tun Abdul Razak, Pengarah Majlis Gerakan Negara (Mageran) ketika itu. Berikut merupakan kata-kata pendahuluan oleh beliau dalam laporan tersebut: Laporan penuh ada di bahagian bawah Oleh : Tun Abdul Razak Hari 13 Mei 1969 akan tercatit di dalam sejarah kita sebagai hari tragedi nasional. Pada hari itu asas perdirian Negara kita telah menerima paluan yang sehebat-hebatnya pernah dialami dengan meletusnya rusuhan antara kaum. Mujur lah Kerajaan telah mengambil tindakan yang segera dan tegas, dibantu dengan setianya oleh pihak Tentera dan Polis, maka dapatlah pihak berkuasa mengawal k

Police Call Up Sarawak Chinese Activist Members For Not Standing For National Anthem

Police Call Up Sarawak Chinese Activist Members For Not Standing For National Anthem Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) official spokesman Shaow Tung Leong (The Star) – Police have called up seven members of the Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) activist group who did not stand up for the national anthem, as seen in a video clip which has gone viral on social media. State deputy commissioner of police DCP Datuk Dev Kumar said a police report on the incident was lodged on Monday (Sept 30). “Based on the report, we have commenced investigations under Section 8(3) of the National Anthem Act 1968,” he said. Under Section 8, anyone who knowingly shows disrespect to the national anthem in a public place can be fined up to RM100 or jailed not more than one month. S4S spokesman Shaow Tung Leong, who was among those called up by police over the incident, said their action was a “silent protest” against the Federal Government’s “unfair” treatment of Sarawak. “We did not stand up because we feel d

VK Lingam dalam video 'Perlantikan Hakim'

VK Lingam persoal kesahihan video ‘lantik hakim’ Tan Sri VK Lingam mempersoalkan kesahihan klip video yang dikemukakan sebagai bukti dalam perbicaraan Lembaga Tatatertib Peguam-Peguam yang mengeluarkan namanya daripada menjalankan amalan guaman atas dakwaan salah laku. Ini disampaikan kepada Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur hari ini oleh peguamnya, R Thayalan. Kesahihan klip video itu dipersoalkan memandangkan rakaman asal tidak dikemukakan semasa perbicaraan lembaga tatatertib dan individu yang merakamkannya, bekas Ahli Parlimen PKR, Loh Gwo Burne, mengakui bahawa CD yang ditawarkan semasa perbicraaan lembaga itu bukanlah miliknya. "Pembuat CD yang dimuat turun dari laman web Malaysiakinitidak dipanggil, transkrip juga tidak dikemukakan semasa perbicaraan lembaga tatatertib. "Kami juga menghantar CD itu untuk diuji oleh pakar kami dan mereka mendapati ada fail lain pada CD itu. "Lembaga itu bergantung pada kandungan klip berkenaan dan kami mengatakan terdapat