Skip to main content

RM2 mil was for Umno to fund by-elections, says lawyer


KUALA LUMPUR: The RM2 million deposited into an account that belonged to Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor’s company was a political donation for Umno to fund two by-elections in 2016, the High Court heard today.
Lawyer Tan Hock Chuan said this was based on investigations by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission and evidence given by prosecution witnesses.
Tan said his client Tengku Adnan had asked for money from Aset Kayamas Sdn Bhd director Chai Kin Kong for the purpose.
He said Tengku Adnan told Chai that about RM5 million to RM6 million was needed when Chai asked how much he needed to contribute.
“Chai deposited RM2 million into the account of Tadmansori Holdings Sdn Bhd, in which the accused is majority shareholder. The money was never for the benefit of the accused,” he said in his submission at the close of the prosecution case.
He said it had been shown that there were by-elections held for the parliamentary seats of Kuala Kangsar and Sungai Besar in June 2016.
Tan said Chai, the prosecution’s star witness, had also confirmed during cross-examination that he gave the money to the accused as a political donation.
“However, the prosecution did not challenge that evidence during re-examination,” he said, adding that any benefit of doubt must go to his client.
He said this piece of evidence had actually led to the collapse of the prosecution’s case as the donor himself came to court to testify.
“Chai’s evidence contradicted the charge framed against the accused. The witness said the money was for Umno to fund the by-elections,” he said.
Tan said that Mohd Hasbi Jaafar, the chief operating officer of Tadmansori Holdings, also corroborated that the RM2 million was for political purposes after the money was deposited.
“Hasbi had sent a bank-in slip to the accused to inform him that the money had come in. The accused then told Hasbi it was for Umno ,” he said.
He said Hasbi and Tengku Adnan had told MACC investigating officer Muhamad Saad Bordani during interviews that the money was to finance the two by-elections.
“However, the prosecution did not ask Saad about the matter when he was on the witness stand,” he said.
Tengku Adnan, as a public servant, is accused of receiving RM2 million from Chai despite knowing that the businessman’s companies had dealings with the Federal Territories ministry, which was under him at that time.
He is alleged to have committed the offence at the Pusat Bandar Damansara CIMB Bank branch here on June 14, 2016.
The charge was framed under Section 165 of the Penal Code, which states that it is an offence for a public servant to obtain valuables without consideration. Those found guilty can be jailed for up to two years and fined.
The submission continues before judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Police Call Up Sarawak Chinese Activist Members For Not Standing For National Anthem

Police Call Up Sarawak Chinese Activist Members For Not Standing For National Anthem Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) official spokesman Shaow Tung Leong (The Star) – Police have called up seven members of the Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) activist group who did not stand up for the national anthem, as seen in a video clip which has gone viral on social media. State deputy commissioner of police DCP Datuk Dev Kumar said a police report on the incident was lodged on Monday (Sept 30). “Based on the report, we have commenced investigations under Section 8(3) of the National Anthem Act 1968,” he said. Under Section 8, anyone who knowingly shows disrespect to the national anthem in a public place can be fined up to RM100 or jailed not more than one month. S4S spokesman Shaow Tung Leong, who was among those called up by police over the incident, said their action was a “silent protest” against the Federal Government’s “unfair” treatment of Sarawak. “We did not stand up because we feel d...

Perlembagaan benarkan Agong singkir PM, kata peguam

SHAH ALAM: Peguam kepada bekas perdana menteri Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad menyifatkan adalah salah untuk berkata Yang di-Pertuan Agong tidak mempunyai kuasa menyingkir Perdana Menteri. Malah, undang-undang tertinggi negara iaitu Perlembagaan Persekutuan dengan jelasnya menyatakan, “kuasa melantik termasuk kuasa untuk menolak,” kata Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla. “Ada pihak mempersoal kuasa Agong terhadap Perdana Menteri (Datuk Seri Najib Razak). Bagi saya, jawapannya ada dalam perlembagaan. “Perkara 40 (2) (a) menyatakan Agong boleh bertindak menurut budi bicara dalam pelantikan Perdana Menteri. Ia tidak menyentuh soal kuasa memecat Perdana Menteri. “Tetapi dalam Seksyen 29 Jadual ke-11, undang-undang bertulis menyatakan bagi individu atau pihak yang diberi kuasa membuat pelantikan ke mana-mana pejabat, kuasa yang sama hendaklah ditafsirkan sebagai termasuk kuasa untuk membuang kerja atau menggantung individu yang dilantik dan melantik orang lain buat sementara bagi menggantikan indivi...

Penghantaran Helicopter dibeli era BN dihalang, alasan ada penyelwengan

Menteri Pertahanan kitalah iaitu YB  mat Sabu yang mengarahkan agar penyerahan helikopter penyerang MD-530G kepada ATM ditangguhkan atas alasan untuk menyiasat penyelewengan walaupun pesawat yang ditempah telah pun siap. RM301 JUTA SUDAH DIBAYAR HELIKOPTER MD-530G TIDAK DITERIMA Begitulah tajuk pemberitaan FMT yang berterusan  membawa agenda dajal dalam usaha menghasut rakyat dengan fitnah terhadap kerajaan terdahulu serta oleh media utama pro PH yang lain dan turut dikongsi oleh RBA RBA dan barua 3K mereka Dengan status panjangnya 10 perkataan  atau dengan hanya share tajuk seperti yg dilapor FMT kebanyakan mahacai dan RBA sudah faham segala gala,  walau pun kami penyokong UMNO hampir satu jam satu satu artikel dibaca semata mata mahu memahami satu satu isu agar ia tidak bias dalam pemahaman kami selaku rakyat Malaysia. Hamba politik PH serta BARUA BARUANYA bertungkus lumus untuk mengekalkan kuasa politik mereka pada PRU 15 sanggup berbuat apa saja terma...